Public Health

In-depth, ongoing analysis of public health, social policy, and public policy, exploring their wide-ranging impacts on economics, open dialogue, freedom of speech, personal liberties, and everyday social life.

Our articles critically examine government interventions, pandemic responses, mandates, medical narratives, and their effects on society. From COVID policies and vaccine debates to broader issues like cancer warnings, mental health treatments, food systems, and human rights.

All public health articles are translated into multiple languages to reach a global audience and foster international discussion.

Is There Hope for International Rule of Law?

Is There Hope for International Rule of Law?

By / / , , / 4 minute read / Articles

Have governments realized that they have been misled by repetitive G20, WHO, and the World Bank’s messages that there would be more harmful pandemics to come and that the world urgently needs new pandemic agreements? If they return to their senses, there may still be time for them to use Article 56(5) IHR to raise disagreement with the WHO’s interpretation of Article 55(2) to the coming WHA, demanding a deferral of the vote until legal requirements are fulfilled.

Is There Hope for International Rule of Law? Continue Reading

The WHO’s Proposed Pandemic Agreements Worsen Public Health

The WHO’s Proposed Pandemic Agreements Worsen Public Health

By / / , , / 7 minute read / Articles

To summarize, while it’s sensible to prepare for outbreaks and pandemics, it’s even more sensible to improve health. This involves directing resources to where the problems are and using them in a way that does more good than harm. When people’s salaries and careers become dependent on changing reality, reality gets warped. The new pandemic proposals are very warped. They are a business strategy, not a public health strategy. It is the business of wealth concentration and colonialism – as old as humanity itself.

The WHO’s Proposed Pandemic Agreements Worsen Public Health Continue Reading

Legal Context Behind the Bioweapon Hypothesis

Legal Context Behind the Bioweapon Hypothesis

By / / , , / 6 minute read / Articles

EUA was the type of authorization granted to Covid mRNA vaccines, along with hundreds of other medical products used during the declared Covid pandemic. Once we understand the basic legal framework, we can investigate the most important aspect of EUA that nobody ever discusses: the context in which EUA law operates.

Legal Context Behind the Bioweapon Hypothesis Continue Reading

WHO Pandemic Agreement April Draft: Additional Concerns

WHO Pandemic Agreement April Draft: Additional Concerns

By / / , / 11 minute read / Articles

The World Health Organization (WHO) negotiating body of the draft Pandemic Agreement to be voted on in late May produced yet another draft. As the previous text was dealt with in detail in a recent article, it seems relevant to provide a brief summary of the additional changes. As before, the document becomes vaguer but adds more activities to be funded, reinforcing the concerns that this process is being rushed without due review.

WHO Pandemic Agreement April Draft: Additional Concerns Continue Reading

Public Health by Way of the Surveillance State

Public Health by Way of the Surveillance State

By / / , / 6 minute read / Articles

Should an animal test positive for a Foreign Animal Disease (FAD), the Covid-19 science tells us that isolation and quarantine are vital steps to take to stop the spread of infection. Both actions are much easier to accomplish in smaller decentralized herds, where natural immunity then becomes herd immunity. However, rather than working with states to rapidly approve more localized processing facilities, the USDA and the EPA are instead working to shut them down.

Public Health by Way of the Surveillance State Continue Reading

Medical Elites' Disgrace Over Ivermectin

ASHP, AMA, and APhA’s Remarkable Disgrace on Their Ivermectin Statements

By / / , / 10 minute read / Articles

In the wake of the FDA settling a lawsuit brought against it for wantonly and aggressively smearing ivermectin, the agency has deleted its postings. That’s good, but we shouldn’t forget how egregiously it mischaracterized the drug, ignored copious evidence in its favor, and portrayed its proponents as dangerous crackpots.

ASHP, AMA, and APhA’s Remarkable Disgrace on Their Ivermectin Statements Continue Reading

Congress' Unscientific Spillover

Congress’ Unscientific Spillover

By / / , / 35 minute read / Articles

One hopes the “good guys” win in the end, but that is never a given. If we want the good guys to win and if we want science to be all it can be for society, we need to push back against dishonest grifters like Daszak, bad numbers from Baric, publication biases in Elsevier, funding biases in NIAID, excessive influence in science from leading health science funders, and all the other social malignancies that undermine science.

Congress’ Unscientific Spillover Continue Reading

Urgent Pandemic Messaging of WHO, World Bank, and G20 is Inconsistent with Their Evidence Base

Urgent Pandemic Messaging of the WHO, World Bank, and G20 is Inconsistent with Their Evidence Base

By / / , / 1 minute of reading / Articles

Disproportionate pandemic preparedness based on these false premises risks a significant opportunity cost through unnecessary diversion of financial and political resources away from global health priorities of higher burden.

Urgent Pandemic Messaging of the WHO, World Bank, and G20 is Inconsistent with Their Evidence Base Continue Reading

History Repeats Itself: Early Treatment

History Repeats Itself: Early Treatment

By / / , , / 13 minute read / Articles

Every respectable film script has heroes and villains. Without them, there’s no story to tell. Dallas Buyers Club fulfills that requirement. And when people watch the film, there’s no doubt who the good guys and the bad guys are. The good guys were the ones who, despite being attacked and persecuted, drastically reduced the mortality rate of the disease.

History Repeats Itself: Early Treatment Continue Reading

Crush the Flu d’État

Crush the Flu d’État

By / / , / 6 minute read / Articles

Part of the beauty of leaving the WHO is this: not only is it simple, it’s easy. The WHO (like its manipulative, dysfunctional parent, the UN) is a paper tiger. The WHO has zero authority above and beyond that which we grant it. Unlike an unfortunate woman trapped in a violent household, the WHO cannot beat us up, steal our money, or kidnap our children. Not yet.

Crush the Flu d’État Continue Reading

Covid is Not a Specific Disease

Covid is Not a Specific Disease

By / / , / 7 minute read / Articles

We should try and find out whether specific measures against a non-specific disease are truly warranted or not, and we know how this needs to be done. That the likely results of true outcome trials would be devastating for many experts and politicians is not a good reason to refrain from performing them. The truth will be out one day in any case.

Covid is Not a Specific Disease Continue Reading